On May 24, 2018, at 11:09 AM, Gerald Combs <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is related, specifically due to AsciiDoc allowing dashes in macro names,
> but not underscores[1] and AsciiDoctor 1.5.7 and earlier allowing
> underscores, but not dashes[2].
As the creator of electoral-vote.com said, "The nice thing about standards is
that you have so many to choose from.":
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Andrew_S._Tanenbaum
So does this mean that, with sufficiently recent implementations of various
flavors of AsciiDoc*, dashes are allowed? (Not that we necessarily want to
require AsciiDoctor 1.5.8 and later.)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
