On May 28, 2018, at 3:39 PM, Craig Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
> However, it looks like the example suggests the answer, without explicitly > stating it: If the VISITED flag is not set, then this is the first trip > through the dissector for this packet, and therefore the packets are being > processed in order. This would allow it to remember a pending request name in > the conversation structure, and use it when the response is handled. It would > be useful to have this documented somewhere: "If the VISITED flag is not > true, then the packets are being processed in the order they were received." That should probably be explicitly stated. Please either submit a bug against the documentation or a Gerrit change. > The other interesting point is that both iscsi and rpc choose to use trees > instead of hashes to store their data. It would be interesting to have the > tradeoffs documented, especially with regards to memory overhead. Yes. Please submit a separate bug about that. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
