Hi,

So you’ve noticed that the community consists more of programmers than 
documentalists. Getting the software right is difficult enough, let alone the 
various guides. 

That being said, the format of the user and developer guide has been converted 
from DocBook into AsciiDoc, but somehow the version information got dropped 
when setting up the new title page. I can’t find if or why this was done, 
either on purpose of by accident. It would be simple enough to push a change to 
have it included (again). 

As for the rest of the content, we (the Wireshark Core Developers) depend on 
the community to send in changes, to improve the documents. E.g., the MATE 
documentation was recently added to the Users’ Guide because of the excellent 
graphics provided by a community member.

Thanks,
Jaap


> On 14 Jun 2018, at 16:51, R. Martindale <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> While reviewing what I presume to be the current Wireshark User’s Guide 
> (https://wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/index.html 
> <https://wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/index.html>), I was unable to 
> find any mention of the version of Wireshark to which the guide applies.  
> Some of the screenshots in the guide differ from what I am seeing on my 
> screen when I run Wireshark under Raspbian GNU/Linux ver 9 (stretch).
>  
> I respectfully suggest that the Forward of the user’s guide (Preface, Section 
> 1) should identify the Wireshark version for which the guide was targeted and 
> from which the various screenshots were captured. 
>  
> The way in which obsolete content seems to live forever on the internet makes 
> finding useful information all the more difficult when its applicability or 
> effectivity is not cleared stated.  I frequently find tutorials, how-tos, and 
> other information which at first glance seems useful, but which turns out to 
> do more harm than good because it applies to a particular configuration that 
> is not clearly identified and which differs from what I am using.
>  
> Thanks for your work on Wireshark and for giving this suggestion some 
> consideration.
>  

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to