Hi,
>> What is correct way to recognize that capture processing with tap was
>> finished?
>
> There isn't one, unfortunately. We'd have to change the tap mechanism to
> introduce a "we're done processing packets" callback to provide that.
should I try to do so?
I found at least two places where it should be useful:
1) my case, of course :-)
2) sharkd (see sharkd_session.c, taps_free)
Therefore I think it would be useful.
Best regards,
Jirka Novak
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
