Den tis 3 juli 2018 21:28Guy Harris <[email protected]> skrev: > On Jul 3, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > As the scope is an explicit argument, I find it quite clear what's going > on already. > > As the two functions are quite different in intent, I find it not entirely > clear, merely from the scope, what's going on. > > > Personally I do not think a new function is required (the add/get/remove > being what they mean), and they are here since a long time so it would > change existing habits. > > I'd like to change habits so that people think of "persistent per-packet > data" and "per-dissection data" very differently. >
I think I crated the original function and I think it has been misused and agree with Guy on this one. The key argument was meant to be the protocol level so that a protocol that got called several times in a packet could retrieve the right data, nothing else. ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
