On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:48 PM Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Le jeu. 12 juil. 2018 à 20:44, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> > a écrit : > >> Hi Chris, >> >> Le jeu. 12 juil. 2018 à 20:30, Maynard, Chris < >> [email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> Is there any particular reason why Wireshark for Windows still ships >>> with Lua 5.2.4? An upgrade to 5.3+ would be a welcome one. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> Can our current code run fine with Lua 5.3/5.4? Based on previous >> discussions in -dev I thought it was not the case but maybe I'm wrong (I'm >> not a Lua user myself and this is based on exchanges from a few years ago). >> If it is safe, I will happily update the package. >> > > And would the existing scripts be compatible with Lua 5.3 or 5.4? > There is also a issue with a lib using by Wireshark (luabit if remember) Cheers > > >> Pascal. >> >>> >>> > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
