Hi Anders,

Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 10:19, Anders Broman <anders.bro...@ericsson.com> a
écrit :

> Hi,
> I think that the problem is that one of these fields has changed name, but
> debugging the registration phase is hard on Windows as the console is not
> open...GRR
>

this seems to be the ssl.record.content_type field.
We should check if we can make Transum more robust to this kind of errors
in the future.



> * The following are the field ids for the protocol values used by TRANSUM.
>     Make sure they line up with ehf_of_interest order */
> HF_OF_INTEREST_INFO hf_of_interest[HF_INTEREST_END_OF_LIST] = {
>     { -1, "ip.proto" },
>     { -1, "ipv6.nxt" },
>
>     { -1, "tcp.analysis.retransmission" },
>     { -1, "tcp.analysis.keep_alive" },
>     { -1, "tcp.flags.syn" },
>     { -1, "tcp.flags.ack" },
>     { -1, "tcp.flags.reset" },
>     { -1, "tcp.flags.urg" },
>     { -1, "tcp.seq" },
>     { -1, "tcp.srcport" },
>     { -1, "tcp.dstport" },
>     { -1, "tcp.stream" },
>     { -1, "tcp.len" },
>
>     { -1, "udp.srcport" },
>     { -1, "udp.dstport" },
>     { -1, "udp.stream" },
>     { -1, "udp.length" },
>
>     { -1, "ssl.record.content_type" },
>
>     { -1, "tds.type" },
>     { -1, "tds.length" },
>
>     { -1, "smb.mid" },
>
>     { -1, "smb2.sesid" },
>     { -1, "smb2.msg_id" },
>     { -1, "smb2.cmd" },
>
>     { -1, "dcerpc.ver" },
>     { -1, "dcerpc.pkt_type" },
>     { -1, "dcerpc.cn_call_id" },
>     { -1, "dcerpc.cn_ctx_id" },
>
>     { -1, "dns.id"},
> };
> Regards
> Anders
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org> On Behalf Of
> João Valverde
> Sent: den 18 september 2018 10:10
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
>
>
>
> On 18/09/18 01:07, Maynard, Chris wrote:
> > Thanks for the tips Richard, but after some additional testing and some
> head-scratching, I discovered the source of the problem was something in my
> profile, because if I switched to a pristine profile, then master ran
> fine.  Through divide-and-conquer/trial-and-error, I discovered that it was
> due to enabling the transum dissector, although I can't figure out why
> enabling the transum dissector causes this, and then only for master.
> Enabling it for 2.6.2 seems fine.
> >
> > Maybe someone could just confirm if they also experience this exception
> if they enable the transum dissector?  If confirmed, I will file a bug
> report.
>
> Confirmed on the latest master. Enabling transum crashes wireshark.
>
> > The exception, for reference:
> >
> > Unhandled exception ("proto.c:6497: failed assertion "(guint)hfid <
> gpa_hfinfo.len" (Unregistered hf!)", group=1, code=6)
> >
> > Thanks.
> > - Chris
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On
> Behalf Of Richard Sharpe
> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:22 PM
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International
> Game Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary,
> confidential or trade secret information.  This message is intended solely
> for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient and
> have received this message in error, please delete this message from your
> system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of
> this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> > Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> > Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> >               mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to