I can't see any blocker in what you're proposing. Feel free to push your proposals and follow the review process. Thanks for the contribution.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 9:50 PM Bruni, Michelle <michelle.br...@spirent.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am Michelle and I work at Spirent Communications. We have been building > Wireshark for many years because we had a proprietary signature field that > we needed to decode and give to our customers. We are looking to open > source our signature field and would like to put our packet dissectors into > the Wireshark codebase. Before we get started on going through the process > of committing and reviewing the changes into Wireshark I wanted to find out > if this is something that is allowed and would get approved (after > following the process of course). > > > > Also we have some changes we have made to other packet dissectors that we > will be pushing upstream and as we make new changes putting them back into > the community. > > > > Looking forward from hearing from you and working with the Wireshark > community. > > > > Michelle Bruni > > Spirent Communications > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe -- Naima is online.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
