On Mar 22, 2020, at 9:49 AM, Michael Tuexen <michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de>
wrote:
> I would support this. However, last time I tried this, I was not successful.
> There were not very interested in defining a file format...
They've done so in the past:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1761 (and
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3827)
and, for non-capture-file formats:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8536#section-3
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
