Yes, I was thinking the same. I should probably do the same for the case below too (for open files).
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 4:53 PM Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org> wrote: > It might be more useful to simply exit if `cppcheck.sh -l <n>` doesn't > match any files. Proposed fix inbound in > https://code.wireshark.org/review/c/37773/. > > On 7/7/20 7:10 AM, Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev wrote: > > Alexis, > > > > Anders change https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/37770/ only affects > a header file. > > Is it now running cppcheck -l 1, which would scan the whole tree? > > > > Martin > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:05 PM Anders Broman via Wireshark-dev < > wireshark-dev@wireshark.org <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> wrote: > > > > Hi,____ > > > > The latest build seems to take a long time…____ > > > > /Anders____ > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org <mailto: > wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org>?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe > > > >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
