There's some chatter on the CMake forums about a better story for code
coverage support but it doesn't seem to have been made first class yet.

There's a S.O. question here where the top answer uses a 3rd party CMake
module;
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13116488/detailed-guide-on-using-gcov-with-cmake-cdash
and
the module;
https://github.com/bilke/cmake-modules/blob/master/CodeCoverage.cmake and
an article that discusses the same with a CMake option;
http://www.stablecoder.ca/2018/01/15/code-coverage.html.

Note I haven't tried any of these, just found them with a Google search.

On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 16:50, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> Sounds to me as something that could be made into a build option, but
> that’s just ’shooting from the hip’, I haven’t looked at the CMake files
> yet.
>
> On 28 Jul 2020, at 11:11, Peimann, Jannis <
> jannis.peim...@continental-corporation.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, I was able to find a workaround.
>
> I changed the following inside the main CMakeLists.txt inside my Wireshark
> 3.2.4 root directory and rebuild Wireshark:
>
> Line 500 (add code coverage compiler flags; changed extension from
> *.c.gcno to *.gcno):
> set(CMAKE_C_FLAGS "${CMAKE_C_FLAGS} -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage")
> set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage")
> set(CMAKE_C_OUTPUT_EXTENSION_REPLACE 1)
> set(CMAKE_CXX_OUTPUT_EXTENSION_REPLACE 1)
>
> Line 750 (Added -lgcov for GCOV and LCOV integration):
> set(WIRESHARK_LD_FLAGS
>                                # See also CheckCLinkerFlag.cmake
>                                -Wl,--as-needed
>                                # -flto
>                                # -fwhopr
>                                # -fwhole-program
>                                -lgcov
>                 )
>
>
> *.gcda and *.gcno file location in Ubuntu:
> /*/build-ninja/plugins/epan/dissector_name/CMakeFiles/dissector_name.dir/
>
>
> Evaluation commands:
> local@vxu-1804: ~/*/build-ninja
> lcov -c -d . -o coverage.lcov
> mkdir lcov-output
>
> genhtml -o lcov-output/ coverage.lcov
> or with source error ignoration:
> genhtml –ignore-errors source -o lcov-output/ coverage.lcov
>
>
> Maybe this helps someone else.
>
> Is this a good way, or is there a better/preferred way to do it?
>
>
> *Von:* Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org> *Im Auftrag
> von *Peimann, Jannis
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 27. Juli 2020 13:07
> *An:* wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> *Betreff:* [Wireshark-dev] Code Coverage Measurement of Wireshark -
> Outdated Instruction
>
> Hello together,
>
> I created a small Dissector that I want to test now.
> Therefore I tried the Code Coverage Measurement from the Wireshark Wiki
> Page but ran into some issues.
>
> At first I have seen, that this page was updated the last time in 2008. (
> wiki.wireshark.org/Development/CodeCoverage)
> These steps are not valid anymore:
>
> ~/wireshark$ ./autogen.sh
> ~/wireshark$ ./configure CFLAGS=--coverage [options]
>
> Starting with Wireshark 3.0.0, autotools is no longer supported, only
> cmake. – According to this thread: Missing autogen.sh in 3.0.0 (Ask
> Wireshark Thread)
>
> Could someone please update that Wiki entry or/and explain to me how I can
> achieve this with CMake?
> Unfortunately I am not able to create *.gcno files with CMake.
> I guess some commands are different and I maybe have to change some CMake
> Configuration Files.
>
> For your interest, I use Ubuntu.
> GCC Version is 7.5.0 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
>
> I tried this already but no *.gcno files were created:
> make clean && make CFLAGS=--coverage LDFLAGS=--coverage
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jannis Peimann
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
Graham Bloice
Software Developer
Trihedral UK Limited
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to