On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 12:47, Joakim Karlsson <oak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe it's time to split .h and .c files > > /include > /src > > //Joakim > > Apart from the oddness of altering our code layout due to the inadequacies of the review platform, there are nearly 1500 .c files so that won't fix the issue. > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 23:50, chuck c <bubbas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It's not all bad. I've gotten much better at navigating the code using >> VSCode since the migration. >> :-) >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:27 PM Graham Bloice <graham.blo...@trihedral.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 19:44, Maynard, Chris via Wireshark-dev < >>> wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote: >>> >>>> It doesn’t seem to be possible to list all dissectors in a web browser >>>> anymore, and those that are listed are populated very slowly. >>>> Compare the loading of >>>> *https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/tree/master/epan/dissectors* >>>> <https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/tree/master/epan/dissectors> >>>> with that of >>>> *https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=tree;f=epan/dissectors;h=18070dacc9b477c446503e46b68b3c128d1ae984;hb=HEAD* >>>> <https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=tree;f=epan/dissectors;h=18070dacc9b477c446503e46b68b3c128d1ae984;hb=HEAD> >>>> . >>>> >>>> I was interested in looking at packet-ntp.c, but that file never gets >>>> listed, even after clicking *“Show more”*. The last file listed for >>>> me is packet-newmail.c. Tested with Firefox 80.0.1 (64-bit) and Chrome >>>> Version >>>> 85.0.4183.102 (Official Build) (64-bit). Of course if you know the >>>> filename, you can click on another file then manually edit the URL with the >>>> file you’re actually interested in looking at, but this isn’t an ideal >>>> solution. >>>> >>>> Is anyone else experiencing this problem? And more importantly, is >>>> there anything that can be done to remedy this? >>>> Thanks. >>>> - Chris >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Not any help, just an observation that github does something similar, >>> when viewing the same directory I get a message: >>> >>> Sorry, we had to truncate this directory to 1,000 files. 933 entries >>> were omitted from the list. >>> >>> I guess this is an issue where others host for us, they are limiting >>> resource intensive ops, such as the Gitlab diff restriction. >>> >>> >> -- Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
