You can try to just capture a single depth (--depth 1) and see if this works

regards
Roland

Am Mi., 19. Mai 2021 um 15:54 Uhr schrieb Martin Mathieson via
Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>:

> I did take a capture.  All I see is a FIN,ACK from the server, after which
> it sent another couple of ACKs.
> There are lots of 'TCP Window fulls' detected from the server end.
>
> I tried with ethernet plugged directly  into my home router, but the
> outcome was the same.  Also disabled company VPN.
>
> Martin
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:21 PM Jim Young <jim.young...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Martin,
>>
>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:09 AM Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev
>> <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
>> > ... when I try to clone it starts to go through the stages (i.e.
>> counting/compressing/ receiving objects/resolving objects) I am told
>> 'Connection to gitlab.com closed by remote host' ...
>> >
>> > Any ideas?
>>
>> Have you made a pcap? ;-)
>>
>> Seriously it might give you a clue as to what side may be responsible
>> for the issue.
>>
>> Several years ago (~April thru June 2017) I was having intermittent
>> problems simply doing a `git pull`. At times I would have to retry the
>> `git pull` a dozen times or more before it would complete
>> successfully. A client side packet capture showed that my machine was
>> receiving TCP RSTs purportedly generated by the git server. These TCP
>> RSTs had an IP TTL value one higher than the other TCP packets from
>> the `git pull` conversation. The IP TTL value in the RST packets
>> implied some middle box was responsible for synthesizing the TCP RSTs.
>> Interestingly there were lots of TCP RSTs, but most of them were
>> "benign". The benign RSTs did not cause the TCP session to stop
>> prematurely because the TCP sequence number in the RST packets were
>> apparently "too old" (had already been acknowledged) and were
>> ultimately ignored by the TCP stack. But occasionally these TCP RSTs
>> would actually cause the TCP connection to fail and the git client
>> would ultimately time out. I managed to contact the git server admin
>> ;) and we coordinated a packet trace on the server side. We determined
>> that a middle box would generate the TCP RSTs when the git client's
>> TCP packets arrived out-of-order. A config change was made on the
>> middle box to its tcp connection tracking which ultimately resolved
>> the intermittent `git pull` issues.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jim Y.
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to