Hi,
No problem. Just so we are aware we dropp support for rhel8 and similiar
due to a minor technicality in my opinion.
Best regards
Anders


Den tors 29 sep. 2022 16:32Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com> skrev:

> That library was not the only consideration. The main consideration was to
> cut-off at a certain point for 4.0 so that we can avoid having too many
> things to consider going forward. There was a message about this on the
> list a while back as well as a discussion at SF.
>
> Now, I get the argument to have compatibility for self-built versions, and
> I could see a point, where we make a switch for a certain library to have a
> compatibility mode. But I am not sure if this should be the way forward in
> this case. Much rather have the nuisance to compile a more recent version
> together with Wireshark, than have one more thing to support
>
> regards
> Roland
>
> Am Do., 29. Sept. 2022 um 15:03 Uhr schrieb Jeff Morriss <
> jeff.morriss...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Also keep in mind that if RHEL decides to fix the CVE(s) in question in
>> version 8 of their OS, they would likely apply the fix for the CVE to the
>> version of CARES that they are already shipping (i.e., they'd create a
>> version like 1.13.0.<whatever> rather than upgrading to 1.14.x).  They work
>> hard to avoid changing version numbers for compatibility reasons.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 6:59 AM Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Well a choice to make if we want to support CentOS8/RHEL8 or not. One
>>> could argue that CVE:s in support libraries might not be for us to
>>> decide on but rather the OS maintainers.
>>> Best regards
>>> Anders
>>>
>>> Den tors 29 sep. 2022 kl 08:19 skrev Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> The reason for 1.14 was a CVE that was fixed. I would vote strongly
>>>> against reducing the Version just to support an older version.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Roland
>>>>
>>>> Am 28.09.2022 um 18:48 schrieb John Thacker <johnthac...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 10:47 AM Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Is there a workaround for
>>>>> CMake Error at
>>>>> /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:230 
>>>>> (message):
>>>>>   Could NOT find CARES: Found unsuitable version "1.13.0", but
>>>>> required is at
>>>>>   least "1.14.0" (found /usr/lib64/libcares.so)?
>>>>> I would like to build for CentOS8...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't actually need anything from 1.14.0, so changing the line in
>>>> CMakeLists.txt that sets the minimum version should be fine. Look at the
>>>> commit below and change one line to 1.13.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/commit/5991a75d78a31ba61de6c162c79c2928da19c302
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>>>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>>             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>>>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to