Hi, No problem. Just so we are aware we dropp support for rhel8 and similiar due to a minor technicality in my opinion. Best regards Anders
Den tors 29 sep. 2022 16:32Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com> skrev: > That library was not the only consideration. The main consideration was to > cut-off at a certain point for 4.0 so that we can avoid having too many > things to consider going forward. There was a message about this on the > list a while back as well as a discussion at SF. > > Now, I get the argument to have compatibility for self-built versions, and > I could see a point, where we make a switch for a certain library to have a > compatibility mode. But I am not sure if this should be the way forward in > this case. Much rather have the nuisance to compile a more recent version > together with Wireshark, than have one more thing to support > > regards > Roland > > Am Do., 29. Sept. 2022 um 15:03 Uhr schrieb Jeff Morriss < > jeff.morriss...@gmail.com>: > >> Also keep in mind that if RHEL decides to fix the CVE(s) in question in >> version 8 of their OS, they would likely apply the fix for the CVE to the >> version of CARES that they are already shipping (i.e., they'd create a >> version like 1.13.0.<whatever> rather than upgrading to 1.14.x). They work >> hard to avoid changing version numbers for compatibility reasons. >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 6:59 AM Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Well a choice to make if we want to support CentOS8/RHEL8 or not. One >>> could argue that CVE:s in support libraries might not be for us to >>> decide on but rather the OS maintainers. >>> Best regards >>> Anders >>> >>> Den tors 29 sep. 2022 kl 08:19 skrev Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> The reason for 1.14 was a CVE that was fixed. I would vote strongly >>>> against reducing the Version just to support an older version. >>>> >>>> Regards, Roland >>>> >>>> Am 28.09.2022 um 18:48 schrieb John Thacker <johnthac...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 10:47 AM Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> Is there a workaround for >>>>> CMake Error at >>>>> /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:230 >>>>> (message): >>>>> Could NOT find CARES: Found unsuitable version "1.13.0", but >>>>> required is at >>>>> least "1.14.0" (found /usr/lib64/libcares.so)? >>>>> I would like to build for CentOS8... >>>>> >>>> >>>> It doesn't actually need anything from 1.14.0, so changing the line in >>>> CMakeLists.txt that sets the minimum version should be fine. Look at the >>>> commit below and change one line to 1.13.0 >>>> >>>> >>>> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/commit/5991a75d78a31ba61de6c162c79c2928da19c302 >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>>> >>>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >>>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >>>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >>>> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org >>>> ?subject=unsubscribe >>>> >>>> >>>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >>>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >>>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >>>> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org >>>> ?subject=unsubscribe >>>> >>> >>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >>> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org >>> ?subject=unsubscribe >>> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org >> ?subject=unsubscribe >> > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe