Hi Bruno,

Indeed GitLab is currently the preferred way of working, so this is going in 
the right direction.

Good luck,
Jaap

> On 4 Jun 2024, at 17:29, Bruno Mauricio <bruno.mauri...@dsr-corporation.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Alexis started pointing out some typos there, so I fixed them promptly.
> 
> Noone said anything but I guess it's better to finish up via gitlab.
> 
> Thank you very much for your support guys :)
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Bruno Mauricio
> 
> On 6/4/24 4:14 PM, chuck c wrote:
>> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/15850
>> 
>> Looks like there is work being done via the standard process?
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:28 AM Bruno Mauricio via Wireshark-dev 
>> <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> wrote:
>>> Hello again,
>>> 
>>> Just as I sent my previous e-mail, I got a confirmation from gitlab 
>>> about false flagging my account, which got reinstated and my Merge 
>>> Request reappeared.
>>> 
>>> Should we proceed via e-mails and I close the MR, or via the normal 
>>> procedure?
>>> 
>>> Apologies for the noise/spam,
>>> 
>>> Bruno Mauricio
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 6/4/24 2:22 PM, Bruno Mauricio via Wireshark-dev wrote:
>>> > Thank you very much for your reply,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I have attached the patch for Zigbee NCP dissector update in wireshark.
>>> >
>>> > I also attached a pcap which contains the added packets.
>>> >
>>> > Running wireshark (without the patch) shows a bunch of "Unknown Call 
>>> > ID" for packets which are now present with the patch.
>>> >
>>> > In case there is any issue please feel free to contact me directly, if 
>>> > you prefer not to spam this mailing list with those messages.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Best regards,
>>> >
>>> > Bruno Mauricio
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 6/4/24 2:03 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> First of all, sorry that GitLab gives you grief. Please do follow up 
>>> >> on the ticket, they usually seem to be open to address such issues 
>>> >> AFIACT.
>>> >>
>>> >> As for the patch, this used to be the channel through which these 
>>> >> were collected, before GitLab^WGerrit^WBugzilla.
>>> >> So please go ahead and attach one here, and we’ll see what we can do.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Jaap
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> On 4 Jun 2024, at 12:48, Bruno Mauricio via Wireshark-dev 
>>> >>> <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>> 
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hello,
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I created a Gitlab account just to send a patch for wireshark but it 
>>> >>> was banned a few minutes after I created the Merge Request.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I tried creating a different account using gmail (and not this work 
>>> >>> e-mail, thought that might be the issue) but as soon as I input my 
>>> >>> phone number, it got banned as well. My number must have been 
>>> >>> flagged for some reason.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I already opened a ticket but assume it will be some time until I 
>>> >>> get an answer back.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In the meantime, what would be the better approach to submitting a 
>>> >>> patch without a gitlab account?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Is this mailing list, or perhaps the Wireshark-commits mailing list 
>>> >>> appropriate for uploading a patch for review?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Or should I sent it directly to a maintainer and if so to which 
>>> >>> e-mail address?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thank you for your attention.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Best regards,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Bruno Mauricio
>>> >
>>> > ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> > Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org 
>>> > <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>>
>>> > Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>> > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>> >               mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org 
>>> > <mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org>?subject=unsubscribe
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org 
>>> <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>>
>>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org 
>>> <mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org>?subject=unsubscribe
>> 
>> 
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> 
>> <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to