Hi Pablo, For me, it is better to add duplicate field and set generated
Le ven. 13 déc. 2024 à 15:38, Pablo MARTIN-GOMEZ <pmartin-go...@freebox.fr> a écrit : > Hello all, > > I've started working on the ieee80211-radio dissector. My main need is > to debug Wi-Fi performance problems, so one value I'm interest in is the > MCS index. To my regret, this parameter is split between various fields > depending on the 802.11 standard used by the frame: > `wlan_radio.11be.mcs`, `wlan_radio.11ac.mcs` and > `wlan_radio.11n.mcs_index`. I would like to have one field for MCS for > the 11n, 11ac, 11ax & 11be standards, `wlan_radio.mcs_index`. I'm not > sure what is the best course of action here: do I refactor the dissector > to only have the `wlan_radio.mcs_index` field (and so, breaking the > setup of the people using `wlan_radio.11be.mcs` & co) or do I add the > `wlan_radio.mcs_index` field in addition on the current ones and having > the value duplicated in the items? > > Thanks, > > Pablo MG > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list -- wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > To unsubscribe send an email to wireshark-dev-le...@wireshark.org >
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list -- wireshark-dev@wireshark.org To unsubscribe send an email to wireshark-dev-le...@wireshark.org
