oh, so 0.99.2 and 1.1.0 is the same tree?
On 7/12/06, ronnie sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/12/06, Xiaoguang Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:glad to know that. but can not see 18717 inOn 7/12/06, ronnie sahlberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:please try recent svn.
the trace decodes properly in svn 18717
On 7/12/06, Xiaoguang Liu < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I found in wireshark Version 1.1.0-SVN-18672 (SVN Rev 18672) for windows, all CLDAP has problem.[dissector bug, protocal cldap: packet-ber.c: 1071: failed assertion "eoffset> offset"]Please found the sample trace attached.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
