Tara Parker wrote:
> I just want to make sure that Wireshark is what we need. Am I correct
> in seeing that it IS Ethereal only under a different name?
The short answer is "yes".
The longer answer, with, for example, details on why the name changed,
is in the Wireshark FAQ; see entries 1.1 and 1.2:
http://www.wireshark.org/faq.html#q1.1
http://www.wireshark.org/faq.html#q1.2
> I ran the RPM and it wouldn't install....
What errors did it report?
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
