Hi Kitty, Well, it worked for me in 0.99.2 and 0.99.4 and it works for you in 0.99.4. I didn't see any changes in this area (in source control) between those two releases, so...
Anyway, glad it's working now. Regards, -Jeff Janssens, Kitty wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > We've just upgraded to version 0.99.4 and the problem is gone ! > Maybe something was wrong in 0.99.3a or maybe we made an error in making > the package ?? > > Regards, > Kitty > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss > Sent: woensdag 6 december 2006 4:02 > To: Community support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] ring buffer ? > > > Hi Kitty, > > Well, I was using Linux because that's what I have at home. I tried on > Solaris (not that the OS should matter) using 0.99.2 today and it worked > > fine. E.g., this command line: > >> wireshark -k -w /tmp/cap -b files:10 -b filesize:10 -i bge0 > > created 10 files of size ~10kb. > > The only way I could get files of different sizes created was to add a > time limit to each file, e.g.: > >> wireshark -k -w /tmp/cap -b files:10 -b filesize:10000 -b duration:10 > -i bge0 > > In this case Wireshark was creating files smaller than 10 Mb because the > > "duration" limit fired before the "filesize" limit did. > > Sorry, I'm not sure what could be wrong on your system... > > Regards, > -Jeff > > Janssens, Kitty wrote: >> By the way, if I use duration as stop condition (e.g. 10 files, switch >> to the next one every minute) then it works. But when I add the "-b >> files" option, it goes wrong. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janssens, >> Kitty >> Sent: donderdag 30 november 2006 14:20 >> To: Community support list for Wireshark >> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] ring buffer ? >> >> Hello Mr. Morriss, >> >> I've just tried capturing (without using a named pipe or any of my >> software) directly on a link, by setting the multiple files option in >> the "capture options" menu. >> The result is the same : 1st file is OK, the next ones are 1 message >> each. >> Did you do your test on solaris ? Or doesn't that have any influence ? >> >> Kitty >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff > Morriss >> Sent: dinsdag 28 november 2006 14:54 >> To: Community support list for Wireshark >> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] ring buffer ? >> >> Janssens, Kitty wrote: >>> I'm working with version 0.99.3a on Solaris (see version.txt). >>> >>> I try to tell wireshark to work with a ring buffer, like this : >>> >>> wireshark -k -w output -b files:10 -b filesize:10 -i >>> /PLAT/data/ss7monitoring/online/k5_0005.pipe -o >>> gui.window_title:"V1.0.60_ProfileID_5" --display=... >>> But this doesn't seem to work. The first file is OK, but then >>> wireshark creates a lot of small files : >>> >>> -rw------- 1 be083074 cc_users 10376 nov 23 2006 >>> output_00001_20061123131915 >>> -rw------- 1 be083074 cc_users 110 nov 23 2006 >>> output_00002_20061123131935 >>> -rw------- 1 be083074 cc_users 144 nov 23 2006 >>> output_00003_20061123131935 >>> -rw------- 1 be083074 cc_users 110 nov 23 2006 >>> output_00004_20061123131935 >>> -rw------- 1 be083074 cc_users 144 nov 23 2006 >>> output_00005_20061123131935 >>> -rw------- 1 be083074 cc_users 24 nov 23 2006 >>> output_00006_20061123131935 >>> >>> >>> I found Bug 895 that seems to describe this problem, but it also says > >>> that this is solved in version 0.99.2. >>> >>> Am I doing something wrong or is this bug not fixed in the version I >>> use ?? >> As you noted, that bug should have been fixed already. >> >> I just tried the current SVN version and didn't see the problem: each >> output file is about 10k. I don't think anything has changed in this >> area between 0.99.3 and the current SVN version so I can't explain the > >> behavior you're seeing. > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
