I'm looking at a similar thing at the moment with a view to adding some
UI features allowing a more arbitrary selection of protocol in "decode
as", but anything I do will be a few weeks away.
 
If you're running 0.99.4 and you're happy to look at the code to work
out how the particular dissectors are working, and to write Lua macros,
then you might be able to do something by manipulating the dissector
tables using Lua.
 
Look at 
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Lua 
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Lua/Dissector
 
_If_ you can identify the protocol you want to direct the packets to
(PPP?), _and_ the one that you are directing from (UDP?) you might be
able to set UDP port <x> to dissect as PPP.
 
Failing that, if you can just add the PPP dissector to the underlying
protocol's heuristics table (if it has one), I think it will appear in
the "decode as" list.
 
This is all a bit vague because I have just started looking at this; it
may or may not work, and I don't know if it's the sort of hackery you're
looking for.


________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Fassler
Sent: 08 December 2006 22:58
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-users] openvpn and packet sniffing


I have tried both suggestions for me to view the RTP/SIP/SDP traffic
contained in the UDP packets travelling through an OpenVPN tunnel.
Neither worked for this reason: The payload of the UDP packets do indeed
contain such traffic as RTP SIP etc as appropriate, but they are all
preceeded by a tunneling protocol.  In my case it appears to be PPP.  I
can not use "Decode as" because in the transport options PPP is not
listed.  This is unfortunate because obviously there are dissectors or
plugins in the Wireshark software that will do the trick but I don't
seem to have them available to dissect the protocol when it is in the
payload instead of the link layer.   I am trying to confirm that the
protocol is indeed PPP.  In the mean time is there anyway to add more
options to the decode as within the transport layer?

Bill


________________________________

Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43257/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/m
ailbeta>  - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.



This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this 
email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy by 
an authorised signatory.  The contents of this email may relate to dealings 
with other companies within the Detica Group plc group of companies.

Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451.

Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP, England.


_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to