I did some more testing and it is only happening on one PC. I have tried changing network cards and even the motherboad and a new network connection. At this point, it seems to be software related. Do you think LANMAN could cause this flood of out of segment packets?
>From: "Frank Bulk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Community support list for Wireshark ><wireshark-users@wireshark.org> >To: "'Community support list for Wireshark'" ><wireshark-users@wireshark.org> >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP out of order segments >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:41:04 -0600 > >You'll want to do a packet trace of the transmitting computer and see if >they're being sent out on an orderly basis. > >Frank > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:50 AM >To: Community support list for Wireshark >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP out of order segments > >On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:10:46AM -0500, L SB wrote: > > > Would asymmetric routing be a problem if the machines exist on the > > same subnet? > >No, since there is no routing going on there. > > >Steve > >_______________________________________________ >Wireshark-users mailing list >Wireshark-users@wireshark.org >http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > >_______________________________________________ >Wireshark-users mailing list >Wireshark-users@wireshark.org >http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users _________________________________________________________________ From photos to predictions, The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes has it all. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline1 _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
