Ok, just found out what happened. The file with this problem is that same one I imported from Acterna. For some I-don't-know-what reason, it duplicated the packets, and it is weired because the duplicate packet is not right after the original one... you have all 62000+ packets in order, and then it starts over again at the end... weired :)
Just saved half of the file as a new one, and now it is working Regards On 2/1/07, Persio Pucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know if the list takes attachments, if so, here it go two screen captures I just did with the file with this problem. If not, check out http://farm1.static.flickr.com/177/376368530_a3ff93cb6b_o.jpg and http://farm1.static.flickr.com/133/376368529_d09c8d4b8a_o.jpg Nuts. On 2/1/07, Persio Pucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's the most weired thing ever... :) when I ask for an IO graph, it > starts tracing it, and it traces correctly all the way to the end (with a > peak of 25000 bytes, let's say) and than, it processes the graph for a few > more seconds and then it just doubles the graph (peak goes to 50000 bytes). > > I was splitting the pcap to send Stephen (it has 15Mb) and on the new > file (7Mb) it is not happening. WTF? > > Stephen, if you still want the full file please let me know. > > Persio > > > On 2/1/07, Stephen Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 04:09:26PM -0200, Persio Pucci wrote: > > > > > I am trying to calculate traffic peaks on some of my captures. In > > one > > > of them (that one that I converted from Acterna, as a matter of > > fact), > > > where on the IO graph it gives me aprox 3750 bytes visually, once I > > > export to CSV using the same filter and add the bytes for that > > second, > > > I get half of the value (1874) > > > > Could you send a small sample capture file that exhibits this problem? > > > > > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > >
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
