Guy Harris wrote: > I have no interest in breaking the radiotap dissector by making it > assume no padding. If there's a *reliable* mechanism for detecting > RouterOS's broken radiotap header, I'd be willing to accept a patch from > somebody for that, but I don't want to lose any ability to read correct > radiotap files.
Another possibility would be a libpcap-based program to read a RouterOS capture and write out a valid radiotap capture, adding the padding to the RouterOS radiotap header. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
