Hi Juan -

 

I work in support and most of the times when SE's or customers take
traces, they usually don't know how to really use tcpdump and what not,
so the traces (or collector) doesn't really care and therefore I get
stuck with huge traces.

 

I was hoping to use tethereal with the -R option and -w option to filter
a file w/out launching the GUI and just peg (someone else's server) to
chop the sucker down before I do open it up and take a look at it. I
noticed that editcap and capinfos cannot open the file either, but I
figured, if any of the programs that ship with WS wouldn't care for file
sizes would've been capinfos but it does care :-)

 

Would a 64bit edition of WS (or built on that platform) help any?

 

 

 

 

Thanks,

Alex Lee

Riverbed Technology

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark and 2GB capture files

 

Hi Alex,

 

I never used CentOS, however independently of the OS it is recommended
not to grow up to much the files to keep them manageable. Otherwise it
takes too much to process them.

Using multiple files when doing the capture and limiting them to lets
say 100MB (or less) you can handle that more easily.

In case you need to see all together wireshark can reassemble the files
automatically opening subsequent files together.

 

Br

Juan

 

         

        
________________________________


        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ext Alex Lee
        Sent: Viernes, 04 de Mayo de 2007 05:18 a.m.
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark and 2GB capture files

        Hi -

         

        I was just wondering if there was support for trace files larger
than 2GB on x86 machines (CentOS 5) by any chance? And if so, how do you
go about getting this to work?

         

        2.6.18-8.1.3.el5

        libpcap-devel-0.9.4-8.1

        libpcap-0.9.4-8.1

        wireshark-0.99.5

         

        sorry, I'm new, so I apologize if I didn't provide sufficient
information.

         

        Alex

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to