Sake Blok wrote:
>> IchBin wrote:
>>> The only problem I have is this just started last week. I have had this 
>>> connection since sometime in April. Why would it just now start to rear 
>>> it's head?
> 
> What exactly do you mean by "this" in the sentence "this just started 
> last week"? Do you mean the very slow network connection? Or do you
> mean the abundant amount of arp-requests? Or do you mean the DNS
> requests?
> 

The 'this' is the ARP packets. The slow connection is because of the HUB 
management. At least that is what one of the Supervisors for support at 
Comcast mentioned. It is suppose to improve but I am not holding my 
breath based on my 'Comcast' experience..

> Many times when troubleshooting a problem, you see start to make
> traces at that time, having no base-line traces from a good
> working situation. The amount of arp-packets might be perfectly
> normal for this type of connection. 

This is all nice and true but this is my home PC. When I was the 
Manager\Systems programmer of VM Operating systems for Campbell Soup 
Company I did have benchmarks for these situations. It just happen to be 
on mainframes.

I do not have benchmarks of my port activities on my home PC. I have 
never had this problem. I only noticed the extra traffic because my 
cable modem light is just about solidly on all the time. I started to 
look at the problem from there. Again I am a programmer not a network 
person per say.

Also the DNS-requests
> might have nothing to do with the problems you are experiencing
> although they might indeed point to some other problem on this
> PC.
> 
> Could you compare these traces to one that was made before you
> started to experience problems?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Sake
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users



_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to