Mark G. wrote: > But for those of us who are using Wireshark to leech large > numbers of images from a commercial web site, the incremental > naming feature would be very helpful. ;-)
Isn't that what programs such as curl and wget are for? Using Wireshark seems a bit indirect, especially given that somebody has to be fetching the file *anyway* in order for Wireshark to see the traffic. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
