On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:49:29AM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: > Sake Blok wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:01:48PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote: > > ... > > >> This is not currently possible because there is no field that contains > >> the contents of the entire frame. > > Actually, there is - "frame".
> And > frame contains "blablabla" > or > frame contains 00:40:3f Thanks for the correction. I tried it last night and I thought it wasn't working when I typed frame contains, but this morning it does indeed work. :O Steve _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
