> On 4 May 2020 (Mon), at 22:50, Peter Wu <pe...@lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > > My proposed change: > > - Change the TCP sequence number-related fields to display the relative > numbers when available. Fallback to raw numbers if they are simply > not available (for example, when the "Analyze TCP sequence numbers" > preference is disabled). > - Modify the "Relative sequence numbers" preference to affect the > displayed value in the Info column only. > - The raw fields will always be available through the existing > tcp.ack_abs and tcp.seq_abs fields. Previously they were only visible > when "Relative sequence numbers" was disabled. This field was added > in Wireshark 3.2. > - Document these changes clearly in the release notes and corresponding > user guides if needed. > > Are there any objections to this change?
Nope, they sound good to me and will make things more consistent (with the small correction that the fields are *_raw instead of *_abs). A few additions: - "tcp.nxtseq" will need to have a "tcp.nxtseq_raw" added - "tcp.options.sack_le" and "tcp.options.sack_re" will also need *_raw versions Cheers, Sake ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
