Hi,

The call tracking system was built on SQL Server 6.1. When it was upgraded
to 6.5 the problem was resolved, and identity fields were not corrupted ever
since.

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Weidl
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:18 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
> Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Next WiTango_SQL conundrum
>
>
> Hi,
>
> >Funny you should say that because while with EveryWare we had a support
> >tracking system that was developed by Dave Shelley which used an
> >autoincrementing identity field which consistently gave us fits
> because it
> >would become corrupt and start issuing duplicate values.
>
> There was a known problem in earlier versions of SQL Server (i.e. 6.x)
> which somewhat regularly corrupted the autoincrement counter. The problem
> seems to have been resolved in subsequent releases.
>
> If the support system database was an earlier version of SQL Server, I
> think you safely ignore that experience now.
>
> Eric
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

Reply via email to