Thanks for the input Robert, comments below...

At 06:45  8/08/02 -0700, you wrote:
>I don't know if this would help, but I have done this for a couple of
>clients, both of which had database structures that I could not alter,
>and product codes that did not help. The method I am suggesting assumes
>that the product database is far too large to maintain in memory for
>all users in the domain or application scope. (This would save a lot of
>hits to the DBMS)

Well, after segmenting the product database into separate tables to get the 
search functionality and indexing I require, it shouldn't be too large, 
however we are talking of a product list which includes approx. 5000 
product codes, names, and prices as well as 4 indexed id columns relating 
to the other tables. I haven't had that much experience with determining 
how much memory is needed per user for such a table if it is pulled into an 
array in memory.


>If you create a new table, like your header table, that just contained
>the information that is common to a group, like the image and price,
>gen description, and a text field where you could place delimited
>sku's. Then you would initially just search on your new table. When you
>need to show detail on a sku, you could build a DBMS action from your
>delimited skus to populate your table. Even better you could create a
>tcf that would accept as its input an array of sku's, then send out an
>array of each skus color and whatever. This would allow you to use the
><@callmethod> action within the results of your initial search action,
>or even within a tml. If your dbms is fast and uses a good cacheing
>mechanism, this will work very fast.

Well, that is the solution that I thought I was going to have to use in the 
furst place, and really what I am trying to avoid, since this requires 
manually separating these lists of products which form a product range and 
colour-grid, into a separate table. I can always do that, but it means that 
there is extra work required for ongoing maintenance of the product database.

>Robert.
>
>On Thursday, August 8, 2002, at 05:47  AM, Garth Penglase wrote:
>
>>Sounds like this could work.
>>
>>At the moment I have a heading table which contains common headings
>>for each product range, so i could probably use the heading id number
>>in product list to build  <@DISTINCT> arrays. I'll have to investigate
>>this further to see if it upsets some of the structure that I am
>>currently using - due to the multiple levels of headings and groupings
>>it is reasonably convoluted.
>>
>>Also, as I have multiple ranges in any given search, I guess I would
>>have to use a Direct DBMS action to create the necessary SQL to do
>>this. However I am concerned that in a product list of 5000 items I
>>might run into time delays?
>>
>>IMAGE NAMES problem
>>At present I am considering how to organise the image names. Currently
>>the expectation is to have them all named after the product code of
>>the item, which works fine for the single items, but when it comes to
>>a group of items in which the only difference is the colour, there
>>will be only one image.
>>
>>The determining factor in this is that the shopper expects to be
>>looking at the same image, no matter whether he pulls up a single item
>>in the range (through a specific search) or whether he drills down by
>>brand or product type and gets the whole product range displayed as a
>>image, heading, text and colour-grid.
>>
>>Garth
>>
>>
>>At 09:32  8/08/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>>If you have a key that's common for a group of products (maybe the
>>>filename
>>>of the image?), you can build a <@DISTINCT> array based on this
>>>column --
>>>then loop through this array, each time doing an <@FILTER> comparing
>>>the
>>>curent image filename to the original database and building an array
>>>from
>>>your <@FILTER> result.
>>>
>>>So each iteration through the DISTINCT you'll generate an array of
>>>products
>>>that belong to the same image.
>>>
>>>- James
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garth Penglase
>>>Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 10:40 AM
>>>To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
>>>Subject: Witango-Talk: Selective Arrays
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi all, maybe you can help me with this...
>>>
>>>I have a large (reasonably complex) product database. Each product
>>>has a
>>>alpha-numeric code and a unique ID and other product related things
>>>like
>>>price, a flag for whether it is being discounted etc. A lot of the
>>>products
>>>are simply one item, one price and displayed with one graphic. See
>>>example
>>>at http://netramp.com.au/hhb/indola.jpg
>>>
>>>While all of these products are singular items and each has a price,
>>>some
>>>of them (not all of them) are simply different shades of the same
>>>product,
>>>and therefore there is only one graphic for the "main product" and in
>>>the
>>>catalogue only one entry is displayed with a table for the colours. ie
>>>
>>>Wella Fresh Colour Liquid 3/0 Dark Brown
>>>Wella Fresh Colour Liquid 5/0 Light Brown
>>>Wella Fresh Colour Liquid 7/0 Medium Blonde
>>>Wella Fresh Colour Liquid 8/0 Light Blonde
>>>Wella Fresh Colour Liquid 5/66 Bordeaux
>>>Wella Fresh Colour Liquid 6/4 Mahogany
>>>
>>>etc. (some have as many as 150 different colour/shades/combinations)
>>>
>>>The problem is that I want to separate these types of products out and
>>>create an array for each which is then displayed as a table of colour
>>>options (click on link above to see example), listed directly below
>>>the
>>>main product image and header (thankfully, I have separate headings
>>>which
>>>appear for product ranges - though these have also been manually
>>>added to
>>>the database for each product range).
>>>
>>>In the past I had a manual process to create this for other sites,
>>>which
>>>created separate external html files which were <@INCLUDE>ed whenever
>>>the
>>>product range was called upon BUT now it is different, in that:
>>>- the Internet product database is updated quarterly (in conjunction
>>>with
>>>their magazine) and has constant changes to the product line
>>>- Their internal systems are archaic and therefore at this juncture I
>>>cannot get them to provide me with anything out of their product
>>>database
>>>but a single flat file with all products each quarter, and maybe a
>>>'changed
>>>products' list (the maintenance issue of synchronising these two
>>>databases
>>>is a doozy let me say, and that's a another issue which I'll have to
>>>be
>>>creative with as well).
>>>
>>>My initial thought was to separate these product ranges out of the
>>>main
>>>product database, leave one product range header item in the database
>>>which, via a flag, when selected calls up a separate table of the
>>>range
>>>colours which I then display as an array in tabular format. However,
>>>due to
>>>the number of instances of this in the database, I can't see how it
>>>would
>>>be feasible to do this each quarter.
>>>
>>>Does anyone have any idea of how I can, on a search where any of these
>>>items comes up, force it to separate these items out into a separate
>>>array
>>>for each instance of a product range like this being found/requested?
>>>
>>>thanks in advance for any ideas - I am hoping that I don't have to
>>>searpate
>>>these product items out into a separate table, but I can't see a
>>>clean or
>>>simple way of avoiding it.
>>>Garth
>>>
>>>
>>>______________________________________________________________________ __
>>>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
>>>
>>>______________________________________________________________________ __
>>>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>                 with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________ _
>>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
>
>--
>
>Robert Garcia
>BigHead Technology
>2781 N Carlmont Pl
>Simi Valley, CA 93065
>Phone 805.501.1390
>Fax 805.522.8557
>http://www.bighead.net/
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body

Reply via email to