It seems that everyone using FMP this way is using JDBC. The connection is
faster but because FMP is single threaded it will never stand up to what are
MySQL, SQL 2000 etc will do.
A future version of FMP will probably change all that but till there next
rev cycle which is usually 1 year you are best to avoid FMP for this type of
setup.
Dan
--
Dan Stein
Digital Software Solutions
799 Evergreen Circle
Telford PA 18969
Land: 215-799-0192
Mobile: 610-256-2843
Fax 413-410-9682
FMP, WiTango, EDI,SQL 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.dss-db.com
> From: Kent Swisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Alcatel USA
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:05:27 -0700
> To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Witango-Talk: Filemaker 6 ODBC
>
> We are running wiTango 2000 on Macs using Filemaker 4. The powers that
> be keep trying to get rid of macs. They have asked me again why we
> cannot scrap Macs and go to PCs.
>
> Can anybody tell me if the ODBC capability of Filemaker 6 is good/fast
> enough to run a PC/wiTango/filemaker solution on a PC webserver? Moving
> to a "real" SQL database would be nice but would mean creating all the
> administrative user interfaces currently in filemaker from scratch.
>
> -> Kent Swisher Eng Services Supervisor
> -> Alcatel USA Application Support Engineer
> -> Wireline Access Products Eng Srvcs Content Mgr/Webmaster
> -> Petaluma, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ________________________________________________________________________
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
>
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
