I really had checked all that last summer when I had proxy server problems.
I know what you mean about extra eyes and I will consider extra eyes but I
have not changed a lot of code that would effect the passed values.
I have however added about 6 branch actions mostly in the two tafs that are
causing me problems. Could that be the issue?
Could I be losing that userreferance in the branch actions.
I am using the branches to run a quick taf that looks to see if 2 0 minutes
has passed since a course was placed in a basket and it has not been paid
for. If it has then I delete the course from the basket and reset the course
count. This was the way I thought of dealing with the fact that people fight
over certain slots and if I don't put that course slot on "hold" while they
are selecting other courses then I might over fill a course or they might
lose a slot.
That is one of two major changes to the site.
All this stuff was tested for two weeks with about 200 entries but never
with these many users at one time.
Dan
--
Dan Stein
Digital Software Solutions
799 Evergreen Circle
Telford PA 18969
Land: 215-799-0192
Mobile: 610-256-2843
Fax 413-410-9682
FMP, WiTango, EDI,SQL 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.dss-db.com
> From: "Jacob Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:18:09 -0500
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Thread pool size- Urgent!
>
>> From my experience, this sort of problem occurs when you are errantly
> passing user reference values. I'm sure you've checked this, but I would
> recommend checking again. Not even with Tango 2000 was I ever able to
> blame the software for this sort of error, and I've seen it a few times
> and even grew some grey hair over it. Caching or code problems always
> turned out to be the problem.
>
> Perhaps there is someone else who could also spend some time checking,
> as it's very easy to miss a problem in your own code just to realize you
> have a syntax problem or something similar. Also, if you are passing
> user references via JavaScript, you may be passing cached values. Maybe
> we'll hear from Ian Daniel regarding caching.
>
> Your thread pool size isn't likely to affect user references or
> variables, and I think you could be wasting this critical time bothering
> with that setting. In a recent thread, someone had mentioned testing the
> setting and found it to actually decrease performance of the server,
> although I may be taking that out of context.
>
> If the application is fairly simple I could have a look for you, but I'm
> pretty busy with work tonight and may not be able to devote the time
> required.
>
> - Jake Stevens
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
>
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
