I agree, I told ya I was Brain Dead ;-)
Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm Authorized MDaemon Mail Server Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm -----Original Message----- From: John McGowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Witango-Talk: including snippets of code Back on Topic Including a taf withing a taf is a totaly different beast. It represents a total misunderstanding of what the <@include> tag does and has nothing to do with the original question. Of course @including a taf withing a taf won't work. That's what branching is for. It's a moot point anyway, because the original problem that Roland had was simply because he had a typo in his included file. I just wanted to make sure that everybody understanded that there was nothing wronge with nested includes. /John Ben Johansen wrote: >I went back into the archives >Look at thread "<@INCLUDE> problem" > >Including a taf within a taf. > >I had an example but cant find it at this moment > > > >Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com >Authorized Witango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm >Authorized MDaemon Mail Server Reseller >http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm > > >-----Original Message----- >From: John McGowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:13 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: including snippets of code > >Ben, > >I tried to send this post to you off the list, but your mail server >doesn't seem to be accepting any thing from my mail server. > >Anyway, see my comments below about nested @includes. > > >Ben Johansen wrote: > > > >>Off List, >> >>Now, I remember (coffee finally kicked in) >> >>The reason your sub-include of the TML works is because TML is one of >>the extensions setup in the web server to tell the web server that >>Witango is responsible to process this file. >> >> >> >> > >No, the @include tag doesn't interact at all with the web server. It >also doesn't care about file extensions. When the app server comes >across an @include, it doesn't care what file extension it is... it >simply includes the file and evaluates any meta code it comes across. > > > >>In the case where an included HTML file calling a SUB-HTML file this is >>not the case. The SUB would not have its metatags processed >> >> >> >> >Yes they are... See the enclosed example... I just tested this out. > >test.taf does an @include of test1.html > >test1.html does an @include of test2.html >test2.html does an @include of test3.html >test3.html executes @currentdate. > > >/John > >_______________________________________________________________________ _ >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > >_______________________________________________________________________ _ >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf > > > ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf
