RE: Witango-Talk: <@serverstatus>

[Robert Shubert]

@SERVERSTATUS did not appreciably change in W5. They updated the Version (Row 1) and “Trip” became “Wisp”, otherwise the structure and the values are similar. It is true that T2K used ‘ticks’ to count time, a tick is 1/60 of a second or 16.7 milliseconds. W5 now uses milliseconds as its native time format. This allows for timing accuracy to 1/1000 of second. A few of the values could be more accurate now.   @SERVERSTATUS does not have much specific datasource information, are you referring to @CONNECTIONS perhaps?   Also note that datasource handling was rewritten, so your connection times, etc. would be considerably different from T2K.   Robert     -----Original Message----- From: Atrix Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Witango-Talk: <@serverstatus>   hey everyone,   i have YET another question :P   for the <@serverstatus> tag, did this change at all for t5?   why im wondering is it seems in w5 to give higher numbers than we saw in t4.  This is for both the same hardware we had as well as new hardware.   it seems like the maxmilli is alot higher, especialy when it comes to our mail "datasource".   I thought i heard a whif of something that the time units in w5 are smaller than t2000 since its more accurate, is this the case?   Or maybe did some columns change in w5 so we arent even lookin at the right numbers anymore??   thanks for the help again, i just want to make sure nothing wierd is going on (: ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/maillist.taf