|
I and a few esteemed colleagues were stress testing an
application and found that we could hang the server if we had the threadPoolSize
set high and did enough large database queries at once to cause most or all of the
threads to be used. However, if we lowered the threadPoolSize, Witango queued
the additional requests instead of trying to run them all concurrently and
everything finished fine. In other words, it worked exactly as the
documentation states. The question becomes, how do you intelligently set the
threadPoolSize based on server memory and processor power without “guessing”
at a reasonable upper limit? Thoughts? Chuck
Lockwood ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf |
- RE: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize - 5.0.1.065 Chuck Lockwood
- RE: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize - 5.0.1.065 Robert Shubert
- Re: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize - 5.0.1.065 Alan Wolfe
- RE: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize - 5.0.1.065 Robert Shubert
- RE: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize - 5.0.1.065 Bill Downall
- RE: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize - 5.0.1.065 Robert Shubert
- Re: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize - 5.0.1.0... John McGowan
- RE: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize - 5.... Robert Shubert
- Re: Witango-Talk: threadPoolsize ... John McGowan
