Well if you are going to 5.5 why not just go with XPATH ;-) and drop
XPOINTER 


Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
Authorized Witango & MDaemon Reseller 
Available for Witango Developement

-----Original Message-----
From: John McGowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Old Witango XML Bug

Thank you Mike... That's not what I was hoping for...

/John

Mike Scally wrote:

>Hi John,
>
>We are running Witango 5.5.003 Liquorice (Win32) and I get the same
>results.
>
>id= 
>othertag=Y
>
>Mike.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John McGowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: 27 October 2004 15:39
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Witango-Talk: Old Witango XML Bug
>
>Could someone on this side of the globe help me out with something.
>
>There is a bug that exists up to Witango 5.0.  For some reason the DOM 
>parser can't seem to find elements named "id"
>
>For example, the following code
>
><@assign Name="domvar" Scope="Local"
>Value=<@Dom Value="<root><id>X</id><othertag>Y</othertag></root>">
> >
>
>
>
>id=<@ELEMENTVALUE
>OBJECT="domvar"
>SCOPE="Local"
>ELEMENT="root().child(1,id)">
><br>
>othertag=<@ELEMENTVALUE
>OBJECT="domvar"
>SCOPE="Local"
>ELEMENT="root().child(1,othertag)">
>
>returns
>id=
>othertag=Y
>
>when it should return
>id= X
>othertag=Y
>
>If someone has a 5.5 server could they please run the test taf attached 
>to this message just so I can know if the problem is fixed in 5.5.
>
>Thanks,
>John
>
>
>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
>
>
>
>
>********************************************************************
>This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("the intended
>recipient(s)") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is
>privileged and confidential within the meaning of applicable law. If you 
>are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as
>possible. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily
>be the views held by LGCSB (Local Government Computer Services Board).
> 
>Any attachments  have been checked by a virus scanner and appear to be 
>clean.
>Please ensure that you also scan all messages, as LGCSB does not accept
>any liability for contamination or damage to your systems.
>********************************************************************
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
>
>  
>
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf


________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

Reply via email to