Peter,

I agree with Bill... It is definitly acting like an app written with 5.5 studio running on T2K server.

Stick an <@Version> tag in your results somewhere.  Put it inside of an html comment if you want... that way you can view the source and confirm 100% that Bill and I are right or wrong.

/John

Bill Downall wrote:
Peter,

I repeat, but more forcefully this time: your application is acting
exactly as it would act if the pages were being rendered by Tango 4, not
Witango 5.5.  Did you uninstall Tango 4? Could BOTH Tango 4 server and
Witango 5.5 server be running? Check your services list.

In Tango 4, it would show "local$ Vars" in the debugging output.  In
Witango 5, it would show "request$ Vars." If you named a scope "request"
in Tango 4, it would treat it as a custom scope, and you would not see
that output at all.  And your assignments would behave exactly the way
you are seeing them behave.

Just because you wrote the taf in 5.5 Studio doesn't mean that it won't
try to run through Tango 4. Please check for me.

Bill

Peter Fogg wrote:
  
I have been using them interchangeably as well. However, the Search Action
specifically states that the retruned array is of scope Request. In
addition, the Loop Action also specifically states that the Counter
Variable is of scope Request and referencing that variable as @@Request $
also fails.
    


________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

  
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

Reply via email to