| I've been thinking it should, but haven't had the discipline to capture the before/after and works/not works. For me, it's just a case of editing the content of a field being written to and then finding that the timestamp broke. Since this is a rare event, I don't think to capture the XML before I opened up that action. It's more like, "Oh s***, that one again!" On Jul 14, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Mark Weiss wrote: How great to have a confirmation of this distressing behavior. I thought I was going nuts. I am wondering though, if the editor is screwed up, wouldn’t it show up in the xml somehow? ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf |
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp issue. Roland Dumas
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp issue. Robert Garcia
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp issue. Christian Platt
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp issue. Robert Garcia
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp issue: F... Robert Garcia
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp issu... Robert Garcia
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp... Bill Conlon
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Times... Robert Garcia
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp issu... Roland Dumas
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp... Robert Garcia
- Re: Witango-Talk: Mac OS X Timestamp... MJPinckard
