Is that for the Windows version?


From: Robert Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Tough question - Mixed Elation!

John,

 

I would strongly suggest considering the upgrade of just some of your licenses. If cost is an issue, this might be a good solution. Today’s hardware is much more capable, and Witango 5.5 is also a huge step in processing power over T2K. I can do more today with two 5.5 servers than I could with 6 T2K servers. I personally think that 5.5 is an enormous step over T2K and wouldn’t look back.

 

Robert

 


From: John Muldoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Tough question - Mixed Elation!

 

I too, will be sticking around. I have been running Tango since 1.x with little or no problems. I have mixed feelings though, since the last version we purchased was  T2k for multiple servers and instances and the price that was paid for that was enormous. This is one of the reasons why we have not upgraded. I understand the fact that Phil cannot cut a break on a product he did not sell, but I am currently running the Witango server on four machines and to upgrade them all would be a considerable cost. Kind of a not broke-don't fix-can't afford type thing. I think if the price came down to a more competative level, sales would go up as word got around. It is the same deal I have with one of my clients. He is a photographer and wanted to sell prints on-line. He was asking BIG bucks for each print, even though the cost of reproducing the prints was relativley low; $500 to over $1000 per print. He got no sales. I told him that if he wanted to sell more prints, he would have to lower the price to be more competative as to what is already out there in the print world. He lowered his price to $50 to $200 and now is selling lots of these. Not sure if this analogy would apply, I do not know the development cost or other associated costs with putting something like Witango on the market. BUT if you sell 100 pieces of something for $5000, your gross would be $500,000. But if you sold 10,000 pieces of something at $500 your gross would be $5,000,000. You need to sell to a competative market at a competative price. At least that is the way I always looked at it.

 

Not sure if this would or could apply to Witango. I am sure Phil is a smart man and he already knows this stuff. But I would think that if Witango is going to take any type of the market that is currently out there, they must change their strategy. I love the product and most of the people I know who use it as a development tool, love it also. Just think folks if there were 10.000 Witango developers out there. I am sure Phil would be happy and so would we.

 

Just my 2 cents worth.

 


From: Stefan Gonick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Tough question - Elation!

I am happy to report that I received a private email from Phil that answered
my questions and gave me the reassurance that I needed. Since it was a
private email, I am not at liberty to share its contents other than that I am
now satisfied. Whew! :)

Stefan

At 10:08 AM 12/15/2005, you wrote:

I too will be sticking with Witango. I have been using it since version 1.0 and love the product.
 
Our structured programming methodology leads to solid, robust applications. A number of our clients have had us rewrite unstable applications, coincidently written by some of the people on this list who complain about stability. The result has invariably been improved performance and stability.
 
While we may add other tools to our repertoire, Witango will remain the tool of choice.
 
Dave Shelley
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Dobbs [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 8:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Tough question - Elation!
 
I am happy with the product.
 
Most problems we find have to do with our own poorly written code.
 
p.

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to
http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

 

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to
http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

=====================================================
Database WebWorks: Dynamic web sites through database integration
http://www.DatabaseWebWorks.com

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

Reply via email to