I have never had the need to store an image using a directDBMS. I
have only used directDBMS when I have had to. And I don't recall
testing it with blobs. Don't get me started on the issues with the
data dictionaries. I have to check them with a text editor before
putting any tafs into deployment. But I digress...
I have already gone there.
--
Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
13653 West Park Dr
Magalia, Ca 95954
ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:45 AM, William M Conlon wrote:
Thanks for the detailed explanation. Well thought out and thorough.
Can I ask whether you've been successful storing your images as
BLOBs with a DirectDBMS? My witango 5 crashes if I try to insert
using <@BIND> with an image larger than 32k, so I am sticking with
the Insert/Update actions. I can live with that, but I've wanted
to steamline my applications to eliminate the problematic and
memory consuming DataDictionary stanzas required for the Update/
Insert/Search actions.
thx.
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Robert Garcia wrote:
This works with DirectDBMS actions and regular search actions.
______________________________________________________________________
__
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
