In addition to controls like this, I've also asked for the ability to set
logging to errors only. My thinking is that during normal runtime, I really
only want to go back and see what went wrong. On the other hand, for
debugging a problem, the more options - the better.

I can really see how domain level logging controls would be good, but that
too poses some problems. I doubt we'll see logging at this level, but it is
a good idea.

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: William M Conlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:24 PM
To: Phil Wade
Cc: Witango-Talk
Subject: Witango-Talk: Logging wish list

Hi Phil,

I've made some requests about logging facilities, and I recall that  
John McGowan pointed out the potential security/privacy vulnerability  
of having postargs present in the log.  So anyway, since v6 is in the  
works, I'm hoping that you'll provide a far more generalized logging  
model, that gives switches to enable each logging component  
individually:
* appfile execution
* search args
* post args
* appfile action including method calls, but NOT method actions.
* object instantiation
* method actions
* variable results, by scope
* sql statements
* sql results
* html results

And of course, I would like the ability to specify both loggingLevel  
and logDir in app and domain scope in addition to system scope.

Bill

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf

Reply via email to