Hi Martin, Those are 102 verified erratas , I don’t know what good it will bring by reassigning them to WIT as they are already verified.
However, those 7 reported listed needs attentions. At least I am (I guess you were too when you were an AD) aware of them but need to find right ways to process them. Something to do in future. // Zahed On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 15:09, Martin Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > I noticed that the rfc-editor still has 102 errata listed under 'tsv' for > various closed groups: > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rec_status=15&area_acronym=tsv&presentation=table > > No AD owns these, which seems like a bad state of affairs. I recommend > these all get reassigned to WIT. > > Martin > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 3:38 AM Zaheduzzaman Sarker < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The WIT area is not meeting at IETF121, hence, we compiled a summary area >> report for you. Enjoy the report attached in this email. >> >> Special thanks to the chairs who have provided working group reports to >> the witarea mailing list. >> >> Cheers. >> >> Your ADs, Francesca and Zahed >> >> >>
-- Witarea mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
