> OK, I understand now. You didn't mean "ACE" but "TAO", which is a > CORBA implementation developed by the same people, didn't you?
Yes, I was thinking of ACE in terms of Acceptor/Connector as well as the messaging aspects. And, yet, in the end, you did answer the question I was posing. > > We are replacing ACE with Qt to reduce our third party dependencies. > All the applications which currently use ACE are daemons which will be > converted to QCoreApplications. We are sticking to ICE for RPC. > Thanx for bringing me back around to Qt. I had looked at it for something else, and Now that you've shown me the QCoreApplication class, things make sense in terms of integrated in-application events with inter-process communications. Do you also use Boost libraries? I notice Qt provides, among other things, threading and slots/signals. Do you use the Boost flavours or the Qt flavours? Ray. -- Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
