It would be a lot easier to just deploy ExtJS 2.02 with witty , wouldn't it :)  ?
Dushan

Wim Dumon wrote:
2008/11/6 Brad Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
  
Koen Deforche wrote:
    
All development of Wt::Ext is done using ExtJS 2.0.2. You can get it from here:
http://gwt-ext.com/download/


      
Koen,

Would it be a good idea to make note of this on the site/wiki?

Document the fact that it's needed, the errors not having it will
produce, and post the gwt link? Also, make sure it gets updated if the
version you are using for development changes (maybe even document what
is considered "stable" version and what is considered development if the
situation arises).

I'd be happy to make a start on it on the wiki if that's where it
belongs? It is quite a FAQ :)

    

http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/wiki/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions

I added this FAQ entry earlier today but feel free to improve.

Regards,
Wim.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url="">
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to