2009/2/19 Ray Burkholder <[email protected]>
> > 1. Why have you chosen this approach and not the standard that is used
> > in most of web frameworks -- templates.
>
> I've used manual templates, I've used templates through perl/mason, and
> I've
> been looking for something better. I think Wt is that something which is
> better. Because, when one considers a C++ class hierarchy, one is actually
> working with templates. One can define a number of base classes which
> provide the general page look and feel. The specific classes implement the
> page specific functionality, which I believe is the basic requirement of a
> template: put all the common functionality 'somewhere' and reuse it over
> and over again as needed.
>
>
> > 2. Is most of Wt target audience are developers of embedded systems
> > where Wt replaces GUI?
>
> I use it for general web pages, web based management interfaces, and
> whatever else comes to mind. It isn't limited to embedded systems, but due
> to 1), is just as useful for genel web site.
>
>
> > 3. Do you planning to include some kind templates engine?
>
> So, because of 1) and 2), nothing new needs to be implemented, templates
> are
> a fundamental built-in pattern of the programming language/environment.
>
This does assume that one would like to, or indeed has the time to get to
know the code base. The addition of the traditional templating model would
allow 'users' to add functionality quickly.
Regards,
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
