On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Koen Deforche <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Pau, > > 2009/3/9 Pau Garcia i Quiles <[email protected]>: >> Hello, >> >> I have two requests: >> - Properties (like Q_PROPERTY) > > I can understand why that would be useful, but since you ask, do you > see a way of achieving this without a 'moc' ?
I have the feeling boost::proto may work but I'm not 100% sure. >> - A keyword to indicate we want a class' implementation to be >> generated by Wt on the client-side instead of C++ code generated >> server-side. That would make my life easier with WWizard (which is >> stagnating in gitorious for now :-( ) > > I'm not sure I understand, but you would like Wt to generate a > JavaScript 'class' ? Yes, something like that. Something which allows lazy evaluation (i. e. at run-time, not at compile-time). -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
