On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:21:05PM +0100, mobi phil wrote:
> the gtk server idea as such is an interesting idea, but personally I do not
> see much added value in creating a protocol on top of a library, when with
> the same effort one could create the wrapper around the library. I think
> creating and maintaining a wrapper for wt for several languages (I
> understand there is one for ruby, but nothing for python), would bring much
> more added value. Even more, I see that in case of WT it is not the wrapper
> that would make much sense, but to link applications agains the scripting
> engine (which is not exactly the same), and allow to write some callbacks in
> that scripting language. If the scripts prove to be slow, rewrite them in
> C++.
Gtk-server allows callbacks.
I see no contradiction between these goals, except that maintaining
several wrappers seems a lot more work, and places more of a burden
on the maintainers.
--
regards,
Jakob
It's is not, it isn't ain't, and it's it's, not its, if you mean it
is. If you don't, it's its. Then too, it's hers. It isn't her's. It
isn't our's either. It's ours, and likewise yours and theirs.
-- Oxford University Press, Edpress News
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
