Hey all, 2009/10/17 OvermindDL1 <[email protected]>: >>> Why the requirement on QT though? Why not just a platform dependent >>> backend, on Windows it would certainly be quite simple (like 20 or 30 >>> lines of code, and I imagine it would be quite simple on Linux as >>> well). >> >> Because I know Qt and the code is already platform dependent anyways.
<snip> > I actually meant something along the lines of just including webkit > itself (nothing else) and displaying it directly with a titlebar. On > Windows that would require very little code, as I think it would > everywhere else too, just a single other cpp file with a unified > header where the appropriate cpp file is compiled in (or put it all in > one file with a macro to determine things based on the OS it is > compiled on, the code is certainly short enough to do it this way > too). It is a valid point. In my opinion, the most important consideration is ease of build: is it more easy to get webkit built and installed rather than Qt? I do not know the answer, but I would suspect that more people are more familiar with Qt (even if itself depends on its own version of webkit?)? Regards, koen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
