en, in fact I meant the following:
before Wt-2.99.2, I used the sample code from example Composer like this :
00096 {
00097 /*
00098 * See if this attachment still needs to be uploaded,
00099 * and return if a new asyncrhonous upload is started.
00100 */
00101 if (upload_
<file:///E:/software/dev/wt-2.99.1/doc/examples/html/classAttachmentEdit.html#a9a3945293cf0a30d35e8bc56312d430>)
{
00102 if (!upload_
<file:///E:/software/dev/wt-2.99.1/doc/examples/html/classAttachmentEdit.html#a9a3945293cf0a30d35e8bc56312d430>->isUploaded
<file:///E:/software/dev/wt-2.99.1/doc/reference/html/classWt_1_1WFileUpload.html#ba40acced8b3ab758f53d17f15afcf38>())
{
00103 upload_
<file:///E:/software/dev/wt-2.99.1/doc/examples/html/classAttachmentEdit.html#a9a3945293cf0a30d35e8bc56312d430>->upload
<file:///E:/software/dev/wt-2.99.1/doc/reference/html/classWt_1_1WFileUpload.html#c17094f2fd6ae8cac1035161f7d80b9c>();
00104 return true;
00105 } else
00106 return false;
00107 } else
00108 return false;
00109 }
but after Wt-2.99.2, I use the code like this:
00096 {
00097 /*
00098 * See if this attachment still needs to be uploaded,
00099 * and return if a new asynchronous upload is started.
00100 */
00101 if (upload_
<http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/doc/examples/html/classAttachmentEdit.html#a9a3945293cf0a30d35e8bc56312d430>)
{
00102 if (upload_
<http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/doc/examples/html/classAttachmentEdit.html#a9a3945293cf0a30d35e8bc56312d430>->canUpload
<http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/doc/reference/html/classWt_1_1WFileUpload.html#66376fb4668a037760a91abad9f83f8a>())
{
00103 upload_
<http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/doc/examples/html/classAttachmentEdit.html#a9a3945293cf0a30d35e8bc56312d430>->upload
<http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/doc/reference/html/classWt_1_1WFileUpload.html#c17094f2fd6ae8cac1035161f7d80b9c>();
00104 return true;
00105 } else
00106 return false;
00107 } else
00108 return false;
00109 }
you can see, in fact, we directly replace the isUploaded() with canUpload()
instead of !canUpload() :-)
Regards
zhimin
2009/11/8 OvermindDL1 <[email protected]>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Zhimin Song <[email protected]> wrote:
> > hi,
> > I think the contents about isUploaded() in the RealeaseNotes are still
> not
> > well understood,
> >
> > this "You should replace any call to isUploaded() with the new method
> > !canUpload() (note the inversion!." should change into "You should
> replace
> > any call to isUploaded() with the new method canUpload() (note the
> > inversion!.", cause in fact the old version isUploaded() never be or
> could
> > not be used in the situation which its name expressed.
> >
> > right?
>
> Er, you forgot a ! before canUpload()?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> witty-interest mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
