Hey all, 2009/11/19 OvermindDL1 <[email protected]>: >>> Speaking about WTimer, I think its implementation is wrong on Unix and >>> could be more precise on Windows (although I'm not sure more precision >>> is required; I've not checked if Wt::Time is used server-side). >> >> I haven't looked, but is there any reason that boost::asio::deadline_timer >> isn't being used to back WTimer? I'm pretty sure this addresses all of the >> concerns listed below. -sc >> >> >> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_41_0/doc/html/boost_asio/reference/deadline_timer.html > > Much of Boost already handles a lot of things better, since boost is > linked in anyway then we should use them, they have already been well > debugged and optimized.
That is very true. I guess a motivation at the time was to avoid the dependency on boost date_time for such a seemingly easy thing. But in the meantime, we are relying on boost date_time anyway, and it is clear that it is not that seemingly easy ? Regards, koen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
